This past election in America may well prove to be a watershed in the Christian Church. Ever since the heady days of Ronald Reagan – darling of the Christian Right – evangelicals have in increasing percentage backed the Republican Party. In this last election evangelical Christians actually voted for Mitt Romney in a larger percentage than did Mormons themselves according to a recent article in Christianity Today, a statistic that is testimony to the desperation of the Christian Right, rather than any revelation concerning the purity of Mormon doctrine or its alignment with accepted Christian theology.
I read an insightful piece in the Washington Post this week about a typical campaign worker for Romney; a devoutly Christian woman who is more than simply disappointed by this past week’s events. She is shattered; her worldview coming apart at the seams as she sees what looks to be the end of Christian America. The writer was not critical of her view; indeed he seemed profoundly moved by her plight and wrote from a sympathetic perspective. I too grieve for her situation, but from an entirely different perspective. My view is informed by decades of working with Americans in a number of Christian endeavours over the years and is coloured by lifelong friendships with Americans based on a common faith in our Saviour. They are lovely, hard-working and dedicated people; but they seriously misunderstand their role in Christian history.
Americans are justifiably proud of their secular history; it is storied and heroic. Although its founders were not Christians in the strictest sense – their theology was more Masonic and Deist than anything else – there were enough Christians among them to ensure a rich heritage from which a modern evangelical tradition has arisen. This has led to the view among many in that nation that God has chosen America to be His special people in a way not experienced before in human history. Mormons would go even further and claim that the lost tribes of Israel actually wandered over to North America, making America the inheritor of the eschatological promises to the Jews.
Not only does this fly in the face of sound exegesis of the Bible, it also contradicts much of human history. Alexander the Great can lay better claim to being the chief architect of the spread of the gospel, since if he hadn’t conquered the known world there wouldn’t have been a unified language to translate and propagate the gospels. The Romans have equal claim as their conquest of the Mediterranean and their engineering superiority provided the roads for the gospel to travel freely. It was the monastic order, not the Americans, that preserved the gospels through the darkest ages of barbarian destruction, and it was the Germans that gave the world the Reformation that propelled the gospel to prominence again. Finally it was the British, not the Americans that carried that gospel to the far corners of an empire on which the sun never set. Certainly post-WWII America has been the flag-bearer for Christ, but that was a relatively short-lived period of Christian history as already missionaries from Asia outnumber Westerners and have for more than twenty years. More to the point, however you see America’s involvement in the spread of the gospel, it is still not in charge. The Holy Spirit overseas the development of His church, and He does not cede His work to any nation. Christ was not Caucasion; His church has no nationality.
This is not to discount the contribution of America to the cause of Christ, but only to put it in perspective. Those that see the destruction of the church as coincident with the decline of the Republican Party or even the decline of America itself forget that it was the Christian Left that elected Jimmy Carter to the presidency (still the godliest man to ever hold that office regardless of how you view his political savvy). In Carter’s day evangelicals were evenly divided along political lines. Now they vote four to one for the Republicans, a party that is seen as being increasing unconcerned about the plight of ordinary Americans and increasingly committed to a program of toxic “rugged individualism” at the expense of communities and social cohesion. Let the 47% rot in their hovels; I want to get rich! It is a profoundly disturbing trend.
Bryant L. Myers in Walking With the Poor writes, “As Christians we can no longer simply view the world as a collection of individuals. Instead we need to view each individual as embedded in families and communities as well as being participants in the whole gamut of institutions – economic, political, cultural and religious. This [holistic] view of self will not validate metaphors like the lonesome, self-contained ‘I don’t need help from nobody’ cowboy; the entertainer who ‘does it my way’; or the entrepreneur who gambles with corporations without regard for the people that work in them and contribute to their true value. It will not create the full human self of the Bible” (Myers 44).
Evangelicals in America are in for a dry spell politically. They have cast in their lot with a party that is dominated by ‘old, angry, entitled white men.’ I dare say that they are finding that not only are the demographics against them; the God of the Bible is as well. A humbler view of their own position in the development of God’s kingdom on earth aligned with a more compassionate understanding of the hurting communities around them will bring the church huge rewards in terms of godly witness to the nation they love and long to see fulfill its promise. They may at present feel like they are in the wilderness. But it was out of the wilderness that God spoke, and it was in the wilderness that Christ began His earthly ministry. In other words, we need to pray for a genuine spiritual revival. God bless America.
November 13, 2012 at 7:53 pm
Steve — this is a fantastic piece. I really enjoyed it. I’m currently writing one of my brief columns on the Divided States of America. What you’ve written, though, is a rich and nuanced essay that I wouldn’t hesitate to send to the Post, Globe or Star (try them in that order), if not the New York Times or Washington Post (I don’t know their policies on essay contributions.) But really, get it out, and with the papers, the sooner the better.
Thom
November 14, 2012 at 8:59 am
Thom forwarded your article to me and in general I agree with the assessment. As a liberal evangelical Christian I have a very hard time with most of the Christian right claiming, or at least insinuating, that you are only a true Christian if you vote for the republican party. I believe that the focus is wrong and we should focus more on Christianity and not politics.
But I do have to take exception to one of your fundamental points. You state that,
“This has led to the view among many in that nation that God has chosen America to be His special people in a way not experienced before in human history.”
I have been in both conservative and liberal evangelical circles all of my life in the north, south and western parts of America and have never come across this sentiment expressed this way. Typically I have heard that people believe that God has blessed America in many ways because the country was founded on Christian values and that the majority of the population has claimed to be Christian while in a religiously tolerant society. Many Americans are unfortunately a little light on historical understanding but they are not ignorant enough to believe that Americans have a lock on God’s grace in a way not experienced before in human history. Almost everyone I have spoken with believe that if God has blessed American it is based on a long history of people that have come before that have enabled American to claim a blessed status. As you state this stretches all the way back to Alexander the Great. I would say it stretches back even further to Aristotle (Alexander’s teacher) and Plato but that is another discussion.
Also I don’t think most Christians would say that America are His special people. This is doesn’t fit with the evangelical mission of the church to evangelize the world. Evangelical Christians want to cast the net wide not claim special status. Why else would are there so many missionaries in the world from America. You could claim that they are trying to promote American Christianity but most missionaries I have know and the churches and individuals that send them, have a deep respect for other cultures and do not claim to be His chosen people. I don’t think anyone I could speak with would say that evangelical Christians in South Korea are any less or more chosen than evangelical Christians in America. Some might be arrogant enough to say this but would be in the bigoted minority.
Be careful with this type of generalization. If you truly believe it, put forth a good argument with evidence. I am open to being proved wrong on this but the statement somehow smacks of the very thing you are criticizing in the Christian Right.
November 14, 2012 at 1:51 pm
Mike:
Me sound like the Christian Right? That’s hitting below the belt, young man. Clearly you and I have been reading different articles over the last five years. The ones I have read demonized the Democratic nominee and then president as nothing less than the anti-Christ himself and equate his re-election with the fall of America. You think I have been overly harsh in my depiction of them? I chose my words carefully in my article so as not to overstate or inflame any further a pretty inflammatory debate. Some of my American friends date back decades; I have no wish to harm them with words. However, yours do not properly describe the situation in America.
Let me be frank: the prosperity gospel packaged and propagated by American evangelicals, the ‘my country before the cross’ ideology which has characterized much of what I have both seen on the mission field and read about in a lifetime of interest in the subject, the ‘mission tourism’ that characterizes so much of what passes for youth mission work, and the ‘rock star’ visits of prominent American Chistian media personalities have collectively done more damage to the cause of Christ than good. Perhaps this attitude is not so much American as it is Western, but much of it happens to be done by Americans as they are both more numerous (to their credit) and more wealthy (to their loss and the loss of those they desire to reach).
There needs to be a rethink regarding what needs to be done in missions and how it is to be funded. Let’s start with this proposition and work up from there: let every American missionary be recalled immediately and not allowed to return to the field to which he or she feels called unless they can obtain suitable employment in that country. Let their remuneration, their working hours and their accommodation be that of the people they wish to reach. Let them then put in the same number of hours in ‘volunteering’ to help the people around them as do the Christians in the countries to which they have been called to serve. When that happens then I would be inclined to agree with you that what I see in Western missionaries and what you presently fail to see no longer exists.
But you and I both know that is not going to happen. Westerners are going to continue to cocoon themselves away from the reality of the people they have been called to minister to, not only in ‘foreign’ fields, but right back in America as well. Is this not why the Christian church in America is being rejected by Americans? It is not that the message hasn’t gone out. The message has been heard loud and clear and just as clearly rejected. Why? Because the message has been harmful and even hateful. It has been a message of condemnation and entitlement, not one of hope and shared loss; of exclusion and pride, not inclusion and humility. Such a message brings no honour to Christ.
Yes there are many fine evangelical Americans. I count myself blessed to know many of them. I wouldn’t write such things unless I knew pretty clearly that they largely agreed with what I have written, even if they wouldn’t say it so forcefully. I trust that they will forgive my bluntness. But the church in America has gone badly off the rails in the last thirty years and frank words are needed at this juncture. I am not seeking your approval for this purpose, but I do seek your understanding of its importance. ‘There, there, everything’s okay’ will not cut it today!