I’m sure many of you have been reading the recent string of articles about Christian churches being firebombed in KL, and are wondering what the ruckus is all about. Well it’s complicated. I can do no better than quote from Gwynne Dyer’s recent article on the subject. Once again, it is a Canadian journalist that seems to be able to take the longer and more balanced view.
In the late ’80s, when I was in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, a friend suggested that I drive out into the desert near Jubail to see the oldest extant Christian church in the world. Its existence embarrassed the Saudi government, which prefers to believe that Arabia went straight from paganism to Islam. It confirms the assumption of most historians that Christianity was flourishing in the Arabian Peninsula in the centuries before the rise of Islam. So what did these Arabic-speaking Christians call God? Allah, of course.
I mention this because last week the Malaysian High Court struck down a three-year old ban on non-Muslims using the word Allah when they speak of God in the Malay language. The court’s decision was followed by firebomb attacks on three Christian churches in Kuala Lumpur on Thursday night. On Friday, protesters at mosques in Kuala Lumpur carried placards reading “Allah is only for us.”
Prime Minister Najib Razak condemned the attacks on the churches, but he supports the ban on Christians using the word “Allah” in Malay and is appealing the High Court decision. Parliamentary Opposition leader Lim Kit Siang simply observed, “The term ‘Allah’ was used to refer to God by Arabic-speaking Christians before Arabic-speaking Muslims existed.” Of course it was. Arabic-speaking Christians predate the rise of Islam by 300 years, and what else were they going to call God? The word “Allah” is a contraction of the Arabic definite article al- and the noun ‘ilah, which means god.
This Arabic word was imported into the Malay language by converts to Islam, which arrived in the region several centuries before Christianity. All ethnic Malays are considered to be Muslim under Malaysian law, and are legally forbidden to convert by criminal sanction, but there are numerous Malay speakers, especially in northern Borneo, who are Christian and not ethnically Malay. They also use the word Allah for God.
What’s the harm in that? Why are Malaysia’s Muslims so paranoid? The real paranoia, alas, is ethnic. Malaysia is an ethnic time bomb that has turned itself into a peaceful and prosperous country by a huge effort of will. The original population was mostly Malay, but under British rule huge numbers of Indian and Chinese immigrants were imported to work the mines and plantations.
By independence, Malays were only 60 percent of the population, and much poorer than the more recent arrivals. They resented the past, the present, and the probable future. After several bouts of anti-Chinese and anti-Indian rioting, the country arrived at its current, highly successful compromise. The Malays dominate politics, but the Chinese and the Indians thrive in trade and commerce–and most people understand that they are ultimately in the same boat, which is called Malaysia.
The state spends a lot of money to raise the living standards of the Malays, and gives them preference for housing, university placement and government jobs. They haven’t done badly out of this deal, but nevertheless they feel perpetually insecure. Since they are all Muslims, while few other Malaysians are, they also feel their religion is under threat. Some respond by being aggressively intolerant of minorities.
Not all Malays behave this way. Major Muslim organisations, including the Islamic political party, PAS, have agreed that the other “Abrahamic religions”–Christians and Jews– may call their God Allah in Malay. But it’s getting ugly, and it’s high time for the Malaysian government to stop playing along with the extremists. The Christians, Hindus, animists, and others who make up 40 percent of Malaysia subsidize the poorer Malay-Muslim majority. Few of them will ever convert to Islam, but they are not its enemy either. Malaysia has achieved a fragile but workable compromise that gives its people a good life. It should not endanger it so frivolously.
January 10, 2010 at 3:47 am
Interesting, after 9/11, there’re all sudden trails of incident pertaining religion conflicts within south east asia region ( Thailand, Indonesia,and now Malaysia).
The pattern of attack seems very familiar …Mossad/CIA/Jesuits deception & lies method which are the agents of Zionist Illuminati.
Whilst religion might be an obstacle in the pursuit of Zionist new world order, there goes IFC (Inter Faith Commission) to liberalise all religion in south east asia, mmm…trigger somthing bit here and there…
divide & conquer plot…ol games…hmmm
Who bombing the Mosque? nobody knows actually. Who burn the Church? nobody knows.
As in south east asia, people there had been practicing their religion freely harmonically for ages until after 9/11 incident?
do you all think it all happend by CHANCES?
ring the bells?
January 10, 2010 at 5:56 am
No mosques bombed here, if that is what you are implying. Nor is there a need to look for conspiracies behind every incident. Resentment and fear are powerful motivators, sufficient to explain the current situation.
Incidentally, don’t want to go all English teacher on you, but ‘harmoniously’ is the word you are looking for, unless you think music had something to do with the situation, and ‘chance’ in this usage is uncountable, and therefore cannot be pluralized. Cheers!
January 16, 2010 at 9:54 pm
Roman catholic vatican is an infiltrated of original jesus teaching. the socalled christianity now is Paganist.
I agreed with globalbacpacker coz in thailand here, the firing and killing was initiated not by locals. jesuits zionist agent want muslim and budhist devotees fight each other.
now, in malaysia, they want use same method, bombing the mosques and implying to muslim indirectly.
in canada or USA the people watch too much mainstream tv and being fed by information by zionist corporation, so they think what they think is right, and it is the best form of control by zionist.unless people there wake up.
i hope steve and pam wake up also.
January 17, 2010 at 12:11 am
Sukuya, thanks for your comments. But just to clarify once again, no mosques are being bombed in Malaysia, either now or ever. Some Christian churches, both Catholic and Protestant, are being firebombed, but the Christan response to all of this has been an attitude of tolerance and forgiveness. There has been no retaliation of any kind.
Interestingly the rest of the Muslim world has been quite critical of Muslims in Malaysia, calling for a greater understanding of the historical use of the name of Allah by non-Muslims. Turkey was particularly hard on Malaysian authorities for their approach to this whole issue.
Malaysia has achieved a reasonable compromise over the years between its majority and minority populations, but Sabah and Sarawak do not like the way the government is restricting the practice of their Christian faith – confiscating Bibles and CDs – and unless this government wakes up and achieves a compromise on this issue, they are likely to lose the support of these two states, and therefore lose the next election.